Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO
Kandala Pulamma – Appellant
Versus
CHENNU VIJAYA VENKATA LAKSHMANA KUMAR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appellant and respondent roles and claims. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. defendant's denial of transaction and mortgage. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. trial court findings and evidence review. (Para 8 , 10) |
| 4. document admissibility and registration requirements. (Para 13 , 15) |
| 5. essence of mortgage by deposit of title deeds. (Para 21 , 22 , 25) |
| 6. conclusion on the validity of the trial court's decision. (Para 26 , 27 , 28) |
JUDGMENT :
B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO, J.
1. This appeal is filed by the appellant aggrieved by the judgment and decree passed by the learned II Additional District Judge, Nalgonda, Suryapet in O.S.No.2 of 2014, dated 07.02.2020.
2. Appellant is the defendant and respondent is the plaintiff in the suit. For the sake of convenience, the parties will be hereinafter referred to as the plaintiff and the defendant.
3. The plaintiff has filed suit for recovery of amount of Rs.18,67,000/- and for preliminary decree directing the defendant to pay the suit amount by granting reasonable time for redemption of mortgage plaint schedule property, in the event of failure to redeem the mortgage property in accordance with preliminary decree, to pass a final decree for sale of mortgaged immova
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
