Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
Moushumi Bhattacharya, Gadi Praveen Kumar
Pyarya Andulu – Appellant
Versus
P.Shankaraiah – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. parties contesting the validity of property transactions. (Para 1 , 2 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. fraudulent transactions and the denial of claims. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. legal grounds for challenging property sales and limitation. (Para 20 , 22 , 24) |
| 4. limitations regarding time-bound property claims. (Para 30 , 31) |
| 5. court's affirmation on the lack of merit in claims. (Para 39 , 41 , 42) |
JUDGMENT :
1. The present Appeal is filed by the appellants being aggrieved by the order passed by the learned III Additional District Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B. Nagar in I.A.No.423 of 2024 in O.S.No.170 of 2024 dated 18.12.2024 dismissing the Interlocutory Application filed by the appellants under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 r/w Section 151 C.P.C., for granting ad interim injunction restraining the respondents/defendants from alienating, transferring or otherwise creating any charge in favour of third parties over the petition schedule property, pending disposal of the suit.
3. Pending consideration of the suit, the appellants filed I.A.No.423 of 2024 contending that the appellant No.1 is one of the sharers in the suit schedule property admeasuring Ac.2.00 guntas in Sy.No.108 situated at Koka
Fraud must be specifically pleaded; actions taken years after an event can amount to a bar by limitation. Courts dismiss vexatious litigations that abuse processes.
Point of law: “Conduct of indifference or Acquiescence and held that, it is settled law that an estoppel may arise as against persons who have not willfully made any misrepresentation, and whose cond....
The limitation period for challenging registered sale deeds starts upon acquiring knowledge of the transaction, not merely from the registration date, reaffirming the necessity of trial for evidentia....
The daughters of a coparcener have no locus to question alienation made prior to the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005, and the court can reject a plaint if it is manifestly vexatious and withou....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
