ALOK ARADHE, HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR
Mallamma – Appellant
Versus
Mallegowda – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Alok Aradhe, J.
1. This appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure (hereinafter referred to as 'the Code' for short) has been filed against the Order dated 03.01.2013 passed by the Trial Court by which suit filed by the appellants seeking the relief of partition and separate possession has been dismissed in exercise of powers under Order 7 Rule 11(d) of the Code.
2. The subject matter of the appeal pertains to an agricultural land measuring 2 acres and 30 guntas situate at Mydanahalli Village, Yelawala Hobli, Mysore Taluk. The aforesaid land was recorded in the revenue records in the name of defendants 1 to 3. The defendants 1 to 3 by a registered sale deed dated 08.07.1996 sold the aforesaid land to defendant No. 4 for a consideration of Rs. 2,75,000/-. The sale deed contains a recital as to delivery of possession. Thereafter, the name of respondent No. 1 was mutated in the revenue records.
3. On 05.11.2011, the plaintiffs/appellants who are children of defendant Nos. 1 to 3 viz., the vendors of defendant No. 4 filed a suit seeking the relief of partition an
BALASARIA CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD., vs. HANUMAN SEVA TRUST
DAHIBEN vs. ARVINDBHAI KALYANJI BHANUSALI' (2020) 7 SCC 366
HARDESH ORES (P) LTD., vs. HEDEAND CO.
'I.T.C. LTD., vs. DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL'
LIVERPOOL & LONDON S.P. & I ASSN. LTD., vs. M.V.SEA SUCCESS I'
MADANURI SRI RAMA CHANDRA MURTHY vs. SYED JALAL'
SALEEM BHAI vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA'
SWAMY ATMANAND vs. SRI. RAMAKRISHNA TAPOVANAM'
SURJIT KUMAR GIL vs. ADARSH KUMAR GIL'
TARIVINDANANDAM vs. T.V. SATYAPAL'
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.