................ vs ................ - 2025 Supreme(Telangana) 1660

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(Telangana) 1660

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
K. LAKSHMAN, VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY
................ – Appellant
Versus
................ – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : K Madhusudhan Reddy
For the Respondent: V V SATISH

Table of Content
1. marriage dissolution facts and background (Para 2 , 3)
2. appellant's counterarguments against divorce (Para 4 , 8)
3. court's observations on evidence and separation (Para 7 , 62)
4. irreparable marriage breakdown (Para 51 , 52)
5. final order and alimony decision (Para 66 , 67)

JUDGMENT:

K. Lakshman, J.

Heard Mr. K. Madhusudhan Reddy, learned counsel for the appellant - wife and Mr. V. Satyam Reddy, learned counsel representing Mr. V.V. Satish, learned counsel for the respondent - husband.

2. This Family Court Appeal is preferred by the appellant challenging the order dated 31.12.2013 in FCOP No.1099 of 2010 passed by learned the Judge, Family Court, Hyderabad, granting decree of divorce by dissolving the marriage between the parties held on 25.02.2007 and by cancelling the marriage certificate registered with the Registrar, SRO Banjara Hills, Hyderabad.

3. The appellant is the wife and the respondent herein is the husband. The respondent - husband filed the aforesaid FCOP No.1099 of 2010 under Section - 13 (1) (ia) (ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 against the appellant - wife, seeking decree of divorce on the following grounds:

i. Their marriage was performed on 25.