Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
Pulla Karthik
J.Satheesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Telangana Vaidya Vidliana Parishad – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. claim regarding allocations without proper seniority list. (Para 1 , 3 , 6 , 8) |
| 2. court's observations on compliance with procedural requirements. (Para 2 , 7 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. discussion on allocation procedures and option submissions. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. findings affirm procedural validity and allocation authority. (Para 12 , 13) |
| 5. conclusion dismissing the petition due to lack of merit. (Para 14) |
ORDER :
Aggrieved by the action of respondent No.1 in seeking options vide proceedings dated 24.12.2021 without preparing any seniority list and taking steps to make allocations based on such options, even after issuing the final seniority list in the cadre of Senior Assistants for erstwhile Zone-VI vide proceedings dated 09.07.2025 without seeking fresh options, the present Writ Petition is filed.
3) Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that all the petitioners were initially appointed as Junior Assistants in the office of respondent No.1, which is created and established under Andhra Pradesh Vaidya Vidhana Parishad Act , 1986, now called as Telangana Vaidya Vidhana Parishad Act. Subsequently, they were promoted as Senior Assistants in the erstwhile Zone-VI as per Pre
Allocations of posts in public service must follow seniority and established procedures, with options processed as per the applicable guidelines.
Seniority in public service must be determined by the date of first appointment, not by roster points, as per statutory rules.
The court affirmed the legitimacy of local cadre organization under the Presidential Order, ruling that the state retains the authority to adjust personnel allocations while adhering to seniority gui....
Seniority cannot be granted to employees not borne in the cadre; it must reflect the actual date of joining. A fresh seniority list should be prepared following Supreme Court rulings.
The court established that seniority must be determined by the date of first appointment, and settled seniority cannot be revised after a significant delay.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
