Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
PULLA KARTHIK
K.Narender Reddy – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. proper appointment and promotion process for petitioners. (Para 1 , 3) |
| 2. respondents argue against petitioners' claims. (Para 4) |
| 3. court acknowledges facts submitted by both parties. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. presidential order's organization of local cadres. (Para 7 , 11) |
| 5. proper organization and allocation of posts under law. (Para 8 , 10 , 12 , 14) |
| 6. no merit found in the petitioner's claims. (Para 16 , 17) |
| 7. writ petition dismissed with specific directions. (Para 18 , 19) |
ORDER :
PULLA KARTHIK, J.
The writ petition is filed seeking Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records relating to and in connection with G.O.Ms.No.33 Home (Legal) Department dated 15.5.2023 issued by the respondent No.1 and the consequential allotment orders of the petitioners vide proceedings dated 18.10.2024 issued by respondent No.3 and declare them as arbitrary and illegal.
2. Heard Sri Poodattu Amarender, learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Pleader for Services (Home) appearing for the respondents and perused the record.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners were appointed as Police Constables in 10th (IR) Battalion (Bn.) A.P. Special Pol
The court affirmed the legitimacy of local cadre organization under the Presidential Order, ruling that the state retains the authority to adjust personnel allocations while adhering to seniority gui....
Allocations of posts in public service must follow seniority and established procedures, with options processed as per the applicable guidelines.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
