SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(AP) 1178

R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO
Ramakka – Appellant
Versus
Muneppa – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mahadeva Kanthrigala.
For the Respondents: K.V.L. Narasimha Rao.

ORDER :

(R. Raghunandan Rao, J.)

1. Heard Sri Mahadeva Kanthrigala, learned counsel for the Petitioner.

2. The petitioner herein had filed O.S. No. 183 of 2011 in the Court of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Kuppam against the respondents herein for grant of permanent injunction against the respondents from interfering with the possession of the petitioner over the suit schedule property consisting of two items. The first item being described in Schedule-A of the suit as an extent of land in Sy. No. 13/3 of Vasanadu Gollapalli Village and item No. 2 being a country tiled house bearing D. No. 3-23 of Vasanadu Gollapalli Village. The said 'B' Schedule being part of the 'A' schedule property.

3. The respondents herein resisted the suit on the ground that the suit schedule property was originally assigned to the mother of the respondents Smt. Santhamma under a D-form patta and that the respondents had constructed two portions of houses and two small shops on the said property and that they are in occupation of the said property after paying house tax. The respondents also contended that the description of the property does not match the property on the ground.

4. The respondents, during t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top