Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
K. SARATH
Battu Limbaiah – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
ORDER :
K. SARATH, J.
1. This Writ Petition is filed questioning the order dated 15.06.2021 in File No.D/ST/75/2021/Case No.D1/795/2018, passed by the respondent No.2/Special Tribunal, Jagtial, whereby the revision filed by the petitioner against the orders passed by the Sub-Collector & Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Metpally, was dismissed.
2. Heard Sri E.Madan Mohan Rao, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the official respondents. In spite of service of notice none appeared for the respondent Nos.5 and 6.
3. The learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is the owner and possessor of agricultural land admeasuring to an extent of Ac.1.00 guntas in Sy.No.155, and another extent of Ac.0.37 guntas in Sy.No.156 of Korutla Villaeg and Revenue Mandal (hereinafter referred to as ‘subject lands’). Originally the said land belongs to one Thirumala Raja Goud, who had only one daughter by name Rajavva and she was married to one Battu Bhoomanna. The petitioner is the son of said Bhoomanna and Rajavva and after death of his parents the petitioner has been in p
In land administration, proper legal procedures must be followed for record mutations, ensuring all parties' rights are respected.
The court affirmed that a revision petition under the ROR Act can be filed without a time limit, emphasizing the need for a fresh enquiry into land ownership claims, especially in cases of alleged fr....
Petitioners cannot seek restoration of land title based on an unregistered agreement; proper legal procedures must be followed for title validation, and corrections made in revenue records are upheld....
The court emphasized the necessity of following procedural requirements and the principle of natural justice in amending entries in the Record of Rights, ruling that the respondent acted without juri....
The court ruled that orders affecting rights must not be made without providing notice and opportunity to the affected party, emphasizing the principles of natural justice.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
