Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
TIRUMALA DEVI EADA
B. Saramma – Appellant
Versus
Station House Officer – Respondent
ORDER:
TIRUMALA DEVI EADA, J.
This Criminal Petition is filed by the petitioners-accused Nos.5 and 1 seeking to direct the learned Special Magistrate of First Class cum Excise cum V Additional Metropolitan Magistrate-cum-V Additional Junior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B. Nagar to strictly follow the law reiterated by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Crl.A. No.903 of 2022 dated 03.05.2010 in Crl.M.P. No.552 of 2025 in FIR No.496 of 2020 in PRC No.53 of 2025 of Saroornagar Police Station in respect of the alleged offences under Sections 417 , 323, 506 IPC.
2. Heard Sri R. Subash, learned counsel representing Sri P.B.H. Vishnu, learned counsel on record for the petitioners and Sri Jithender Rao Veeramalla, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondents.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the trial court has not followed the correct principles of law and has taken cognizance of the offences against the accused without any reasoning and that in a mechanical manner the said orders are passed and that the trial court failed to follow the guidelines of the Apex Court while taking cognizance of the offences against the accused. Thus, the learned counsel h
A Magistrate cannot recall its own cognizance order without recording reasons for taking cognizance, which is essential for a lawful procedure.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
