IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA, GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR
Telangana State Election Commission, Rep. by the Commissioner – Appellant
Versus
Chinthamalla Kalpana, D/o.Gopal Dharavah – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. interim order allowing participation in elections (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments on the legality of inclusion in electoral rolls (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. defense of the writ petitioner on electoral registration (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. court's consideration of interim nature and potential remedies (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. importance of upholding democratic election processes (Para 13 , 14) |
| 6. testing maintainability of interim orders in appeals (Para 15 , 16) |
| 7. conclusion and dismissal of the appeal (Para 17 , 18) |
JUDGMENT:
(per Hon’ble Justice Gadi Praveen Kumar)
Heard Sri G.Vidya Sagar, learned Senior Counsel representing Sri P.Sudheer Rao, learned counsel appearing for the appellant/State Election Commission, Sri T.P.S.Harsha, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.1/Writ Petitioner and Sri Avinash Desai, learned Senior Counsel representing Sri Kopal Sharraf, learned counsel appearing for respondent No. 8/ Election Commission of India.
2. The Appeal arises out of an interim order dated 28.11.2025 passed by a learned Single Judge in W.P.No.36510 of 2025 directing to consider the name of the Writ Petitioner for participating in the ensuing Elections to Indugula Village and Gram
Court ruled that the interim order allowing inclusion of a voter's name in electoral rolls upholds electoral integrity, even pending final resolution of eligibility challenges.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.