Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
RENUKA YARA
A. Vijaya Kumari – Appellant
Versus
A. Narahari Rao – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. establishing lawful possession requires valid title. (Para 3 , 4 , 6) |
| 2. appellate review limited to substantial legal questions. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. title examination is normal in injunction suits. (Para 12 , 13) |
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Sri A. Venkatesh, learned Senior Counsel representing Sri Sriram Polali, learned counsel for the appellant on admission. Perused the entire record.
3. The brief facts of the case are that the appellant filed suit for perpetual injunction against the respondents claiming to be absolute owner and possessor of the land admeasuring 3240 square yards out of 4000 square yards in Sy.No.105 (part) situated at Medipally Village, Ghatkesar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District (hereinafter referred to as ‘suit schedule property’) under registered sale deed document bearing No.11913/2003, dated 30.03.2003 marked under Ex.A-1. The registered sale deed was executed by General Power of Attorney (‘GPA’) holder A. Venkateshwar Rao representing the owners G. Yadaiah and K. Bikshapathy. The said G. Yadaiah and K. Bikshapathy have purchased suit schedule property from one Meer Ahmed Khan through his GPA holder Mohd. Yaseen through registered document No.2669/1982 d
The court affirmed that in seeking an injunction over immovable property, examination of title is necessary if challenged by the opposing party.
A suit for injunction is not maintainable if the plaintiff has knowledge of unclear title issues and the vendors lack the right to convey property.
In a second appeal, the court cannot overturn concurrent factual findings of lower courts without proof of legal error or perversity, stressing the burden of proof on the claimant regarding possessio....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that a plaintiff cannot claim injunction against the true owner without lawful possession and title.
In a suit for perpetual injunction, the plaintiff's possession prevails over claims of title disputes, emphasizing the need for factual evidence of possession rather than just title claims.
In injunction suits, the plaintiff must establish possession and title; revenue records are not conclusive proof of ownership.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
