SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Telangana) 66

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
JUVVADI SRIDEVI, J.
B. Sridevi and Another - Petitioners
Versus
The State of Telangana, Rep. by Public Prosecutor and Another – Respondents
Criminal Petition No.8619 of 2024 
Decided On : 28-01-2026

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : A PRABHAKAR RAO
For the Respondent: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The court highlighted that vague and omnibus allegations without specific attribution to accused do not uphold a prima facie case under Section 304B IPC.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code - Section 304B - Dowry death allegations against relatives - Petitioners sought to quash proceedings based on lack of evidence - Specific roles in harassment not established - Presence of petitioners at the time of alleged harassment not demonstrated. (Paras 3, 11, 12)

(B) Criminal Procedure Code - Section 482 - High Court's jurisdiction - Examination of allegations must disclose prima facie case against accused - Vague and omnibus allegations insufficient for trial. (Paras 8, 10)

Facts of the case:
Petitioners-accused Nos.3 and 4 are accused of harassment related to dowry, leading to the deceased's suicide shortly after marriage. The allegations were vague without evidence tying petitioners to harassment 'soon before her death.'

Findings of Court:
Insufficient evidence against petitioners-accused No.3 and 4 to substantiate charges, resulting in a quashing of proceedings.

Issues: Whether the allegations of harassment constituted a case under Section 304B IPC against the petitioners.

Ratio Decidendi: Court highlighted the necessity for specific evidence linking accused's actions to harassment 'soon before death' for substantiating a case under Section 304B.

Result: Petition allowed; proceedings quashed.

ORDER :

JUVVADI SRIDEVI, J.

This Criminal Petition is filed by the petitioners-accused Nos.3 and 4 seeking to quash the proceedings against them in S.C.No.110 of 2024 on the file of the learned Principal District & Sessions Judge, Hanumakonda, registered for the offence under Section 304B of the Indian Penal Code (for short ‘IPC’).

02. Heard Sri A. Prabhakar Rao, learned counsel for the petitioners-accused; Sri M.Ramachandra Reddy, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State-respondent No.1 and Sri V. Venkat Ram Narsaiah, learned counsel for the respondent No.2. Perused the record.

03(a). The brief facts of the prosecution case are as follows: The complainant-respondent No.2 is the father of Revuri Niharika Reddy (hereinafter referred to as “the deceased”). The deceased was married to the accused No.1. The accused No.2 is the mother of the accused No.1; the petitioner-accused No.3 is his sister; and the petitioner- accused No.4 is the husband of the petitioner-accused No.3. The marriage of the deceased with the accused No.1 was solemnized on 14.08.2021 at Paradise Function Hall, Kazipet, in the presence of elders. At the time of marriage, it is alleged that, pursuant to the demands of the accused Nos.1 to 4, the respondent No.2 gave a net cash amount of Rs.3,00,000/-, a plot admeasuring 300 Sq.yds worth approximately Rs.1 crore situated at Julaiwada, Hanamkonda, and gold ornaments weighing about 8 tulas to the accused Nos.1 and 2 as dowry.

03(b). It is further alleged that an amount of Rs.2,00,000/- towards adapaduchu katnam was given to the petitioners-accused Nos.3 and 4. Subsequent to the marriage, the accused Nos.1 to 4 treated the deceased well for about one year. During this period, the deceased and the accused No.1 were blessed with a female child. About six months prior to the incident, the deceased and the accused No.1 took a house on rent at Bhavani Nagar, Hanamkonda, and were residing there. Thereafter, the accused Nos.1 to 4 allegedly started subjecting the deceased to mental and physical harassment, demanding that she bring an additional dowry amount of Rs.4.5 lakhs from her parents, stating that the accused No.1 had incurred hospital expenses towards treatment of their child. The deceased informed the respondent No.2 about the harassment, whereupon her parents visited the house of the accused No.1 and requested the accused Nos.1 to 4 to wait for some time, assuring them that they would arrange the demanded amount. However, despite this assurance, the accused Nos.1 to 4 allegedly continued to harass the deceased for additional dowry.

03(c). It is further alleged that the petitioners-accused Nos.3 and 4, who reside at Prashanthnagar, Hanamkonda, used to frequently visit the rented house at Bhavani Nagar, and, along with the accused No.2, subjected the deceased to harassment. About four days prior to the incident, the accused No.2 came to reside with the accused No.1 and the deceased in the said rented house. During this period, the accused No.2 allegedly called the petitioners-accused Nos.3 and 4 to the house, and all of them harassed the deceased. When the deceased expressed the said grievance to the accused No.1, he allegedly supported the accused No.2 instead of restraining her. The deceased again informed the respondent No.2 about the harassment. Consequently, on 10.05.2023, her parents visited the rented house at Bhavani Nagar, Hanamkonda, and consoled her. On that occasion, the accused No.2 allegedly abused the parents of the deceased in filthy language, upon which they returned to their residence the same day.

03(d). It is alleged that, after their departure, on the night of 10.05.2023, the accused Nos.1 and 2 continued to harass the deceased for additional dowry until about 23:00 hours. Unable to bear the harassment meted out by the accused Nos.1 to 4, the deceased went into her bedroom, bolted the door from inside, and committed suicide by hanging herself from the ceiling fan with a cotton saree. On the ne

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top