Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO
State of Telangana, Represented by its Principal Secretary – Appellant
Versus
Muthineni Santhosh Rao, S/o. Laxman Rao – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO, J.
1. This Memorandum of Appeal is filed under Section 96 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short ‘CPC’) assailing the judgment and decree in OS.No.115 of 2015, dated 27.02.2020 passed by the I Additional District Judge at Karimnagar.
2. Appellants are defendant Nos.1 to 4 and respondent is the plaintiff in OS.No.115 of 2015.
3.1. Respondent-plaintiff has filed suit for recovery of Rs.17,21,834/- with interest @ 18% per annum for the delayed payment on the principle amount of Rs.31,85,170/- for 32 to 39 months and for costs from the appellants-defendants jointly and severally.
3.2. It is stated in the plaint that the respondent-plaintiff is a registered Contractor and executing works under various Departments including SRSP. Appellant No.4-defendant No.4 entered into contract for execution of (11) works. The (11) works are as under:
ANNEXURE
STATEMENT SHOWING THE LIST OF WORKS CARRIED OUT BY M.SANTHOSH RAO, CONTRACTOR ON WHICH INTEREST PAYABLE FOR THE DELAY CAUSED ON THE PART OF DEPARTMENT
3.3. Respondent-plaintiff has commenced the work and completed the same within the agreement time without compromising in quality and quantity and the Incharge Field
The court upheld that delayed payments must be compensated with interest, emphasizing that the appellants’ claims of irregularities were unsubstantiated and did not impede the contractors' right to r....
The court affirmed that a contractor's claims for delays caused by defendants were valid, and it has the discretion to adjust interest rates based on economic conditions.
The lack of privity of contract and failure to establish a cause of action were central to the court's decision.
Civil Courts have jurisdiction to hear claims under construction contracts barred from arbitration, provided they arise within the limitation period set by specific contract conditions.
The court established that contracts signed under economic duress are void, emphasizing the importance of equal bargaining power in contractual agreements.
The court upheld the plaintiff's claims for withheld payments under the contract, establishing entitlement based on completed work despite defendants' claims of substandard quality and modified the i....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the entitlement to extra work payment and interest on delayed payments under the terms of the contract and the Interest Act, 1978.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
