IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
Ayanala Swarupa – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana, Department of Labour Rep. by Principal Secretary to Government – Respondent
Understood. Please provide the legal document content (inside
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. employment rights and grievances of petitioners. (Para 1) |
| 2. legal procedures regarding standing orders and employee rights. (Para 2) |
| 3. defendant's position and rebuttal of allegations. (Para 3) |
| 4. contractual obligations and standing orders applicability. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 5. court's view on duress in employment contracts. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 6. court's directive to conclude action against respondent. (Para 12) |
| 7. final decision and order of the court. (Para 13 , 14) |
ORDER :
Nagesh Bheemapaka, J.
Petitioner No.1 claims to have joined the 4th respondent - Private Company on 24.01.2022 and subsequently, resigned on 06.02.2024 with last working day as 20.02.2024. Despite multiple follow-ups via e mail, she was not issued Relieving Letter i.e. Experience Certificate by the company which is violative of fundamental right under Article 19 (1) (g) of the Constitution. Hence, a representation was filed with the office of the respondents. It is stated, she promised to produce the same to the present employer in 90 days as the companies usually take some time to finish the formalities of an employee leaving and issuing the final "full settlement" to the employees. The 4th respondent had al
The court held that the coersion via blank cheques invalidates employment contracts, stressing the statutory right to a service certificate and the necessity of standing orders for companies with 50 ....
Employer justified in withholding relieving letter/service certificate from employee breaching training bond by premature resignation without notice or damages; Industrial Court cannot grant interim ....
The court upheld the termination of a permanent workman for unauthorized absence under Standing Orders, emphasizing the importance of procedural compliance and the impact of laches in filing the writ....
Point of Law : Employment and Service matter - Confirmation of Probationers - Provisions of Act of 1971 were neither applicable in facts of case as pleaded by the employees nor did complaint make out....
(1) Protection of Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 cannot be denied to a workman merely for reason that employer grants him other services benefits such as pension, gratuity etc. und....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.