Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
Ayanala Swarupa – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana, Department of Labour Rep. by Principal Secretary to Government – Respondent
Understood. Please provide the legal document content (inside
ORDER :
Nagesh Bheemapaka, J.
Petitioner No.1 claims to have joined the 4th respondent - Private Company on 24.01.2022 and subsequently, resigned on 06.02.2024 with last working day as 20.02.2024. Despite multiple follow-ups via e mail, she was not issued Relieving Letter i.e. Experience Certificate by the company which is violative of fundamental right under Article 19 (1) (g) of the Constitution. Hence, a representation was filed with the office of the respondents. It is stated, she promised to produce the same to the present employer in 90 days as the companies usually take some time to finish the formalities of an employee leaving and issuing the final "full settlement" to the employees. The 4th respondent had also not cleared the rightful wages at Rs.5,80,000/- due to her.
1.2. The case of petitioner No.2 is that he joined in the position of ‘Management Trainee-Growth’ in the 4th respondent company on 06.07.2023 and as demanded, he signed an employment bond of two years, however, the Company through their Human Resources (HR) personnel abruptly in January 2024 required them to sign and handover signed blank cheque leafs as security to the Employment Bond signed, for which, petiti
The court held that the coersion via blank cheques invalidates employment contracts, stressing the statutory right to a service certificate and the necessity of standing orders for companies with 50 ....
The court upheld the termination of a permanent workman for unauthorized absence under Standing Orders, emphasizing the importance of procedural compliance and the impact of laches in filing the writ....
Point of Law : Employment and Service matter - Confirmation of Probationers - Provisions of Act of 1971 were neither applicable in facts of case as pleaded by the employees nor did complaint make out....
(1) Protection of Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 cannot be denied to a workman merely for reason that employer grants him other services benefits such as pension, gratuity etc. und....
A statutory corporation has the power to terminate the services of its employees under Rule 13 or Regulation 17, depending on the nature of the case. The termination of service under Rule 13 is valid....
Disciplinary proceedings must adhere to statutory provisions; if Service Regulations are not notified under Section 13B of the Act, Model Standing Orders apply and render any contrary action void.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
