IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
T.VINOD KUMAR, P.SREE SUDHA
State of Andhra Pradesh – Appellant
Versus
Vijayanthi Co-operative Housing Society – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. scope of article 226 petitions and jurisdiction issues. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. claim of ownership under the a.p. land grabbing act. (Para 5 , 6 , 29) |
| 3. evidence and documentation issues in property claims. (Para 11 , 12 , 18) |
| 4. possession and public knowledge affecting property rights. (Para 19 , 20 , 39) |
| 5. maintenance of property rights and legislative implications. (Para 24 , 30 , 45 , 46) |
| 6. implications of nay evidence regarding trespass or land grabbing. (Para 58 , 62 , 85) |
| 7. judicial review limitations regarding findings of special courts. (Para 124 , 125 , 126) |
| 8. dismissal of writ petitions and costs awarded. (Para 189 , 190 , 191) |
ORDER:
(Per Hon’ble Sri Justice T.Vinod Kumar)
This Writ Petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is filed by the petitioner/applicants, with the following prayer:
It is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of certiorari by calling for the records from the Hon'ble Special Court under the A.P. Land Grabbing (P) Act, Hyderabad in LGC No.167 of 1997 and consequently quash the Judgement and Decree passed by the Special Court in LGC No
Sarwarlal and Ors. vs. The State of Hyderabad
Mandal Revenue Officer vs. Goundla Venkaiah and another
Nagubai Ammal and Ors. vs. B. Shama Rao and Ors.
S.P. Chengalvaraya Naidu vss. Jagannath
Anil Kumar Modi v. Tarsem Kumar Gupta
K.V. Sreenivasa Rao Vs Special Court
State of A.P. v. P.V. Hanumantha Rao
Goundla Venkaiah and another(Supra)
State of A.P. v. Prameela Modi
Kaushik Coop. Building Society v. N. Parvathamma
Sri Bhavanarayanaswamivari Temple v. Vadapalli Venkata Bhavanarayanacharyulu
Om Prakash Singh v. M. Lingamaiah
Bahaggan Bai v. Mandal Revenue Officer, R.R. Dist
K. Sharada Bai vs. Shamshunnisa
Suraj Lamp and Industries (P) Ltd. thru. DIR vs. State of Haryana and Ors
The burden of proof in land ownership disputes lies with the claimant; mere allegations without evidence of title or ownership do not suffice to substantiate claims under the A.P. Land Grabbing Act.
Points of Law : Three principles of res judicata as between co-defendants were delineated as: (1) There must be a conflict of interest between the defendants; (2) it must be necessary to decide this ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.