SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(All) 2400

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD 
SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J.
Priyankar Upadhyaya - Appellant 
Versus 
Union of India and others - Respondents
Writ A No.18801 of 2024, Connected with Writ-A Nos. 7111 of 2020; 9001 of 2023; 14206 of 2024; 14211 of 2024; 14223 of 2024; 14238 of 2024; 17872 of 2024 and 2093 of 2025
Decided on : 18-03-2025

Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :S/Sri R.K. Ojha, G.K. Singh, Pradeep Chandra, Senior Advocates and Shivendu Ojha, Sankalp Narain, Ms. Asha Parihar, Manoj Kumar Singh, Advocates
For the Respondents:S/Sri V.K. Upadhyay, Ajit Kumar Singh, Shashi Prakash Singh, Senior Advocates and Ritvik Upadhyay, Hem Pratap Singh, Manoj Kumar Singh, Purnendu Kumar Singh, Dhananjay Awasthi, Rahul Jain, Advocates

Options exercised after the cut-off date for switching from CPF to GPF-cum-Pension Scheme are non-est, and the university's authority to set the cut-off date is valid.

Headnote:(A) Office Memorandum dated 01.05.1987 - Change from Contributory Provident Fund Scheme to Pension Scheme - The petitioners, retired employees of Banaras Hindu University, sought to switch from CPF to GPF-cum-Pension Scheme, arguing their options were non-est due to late exercise. The court found that the university's adoption of the scheme and the cut-off date of 09.07.1988 were legally valid, and options exercised after the prescribed cut-off date were not permissible. The Supreme Court's ruling in a related case was distinguished on factual grounds. (Paras 1, 6, 30).

Findings of Court:
The court upheld the university's authority to set the cut-off date and dismissed the petitions for lack of legal grounds. (Paras 31, 32).

Issues: The main issues included the validity of the cut-off dates and the applicability of the Supreme Court ruling to the petitioners.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that options exercised after the cut-off date are non-est, affirming that the university's adoption of the scheme was valid.

Result: All writ petitions dismissed.

Table of Content
1. retired employees of banaras hindu university under cpf scheme. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. arguments presented by petitioners regarding option to switch schemes. (Para 7 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 19 , 20)
3. court's observations on the applicability of previous judgments. (Para 8 , 18 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 31)
4. judgment in university of delhi vs. smt. shashi kiran is applicable. (Para 21 , 30)
5. final decision on the writ petitions. (Para 32)

JUDGMENT :

SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J.

1. Petitioners, in above referred writ petitions, are retired teaching and non-teaching employees of Banaras Hindu University and they are beneficiaries of Contributory Provident Fund Scheme (hereinafter referred to as “CPF Scheme”).

2. Government of India has issued an Office Memorandum dated 01.05.1987 on a subject “Change over of the Central Government employees from the Contributory Provident Fund Scheme to Pension Scheme-Implementation of the commendations of the Fourth Central Pay Commission”. Salient features of said Office Memorandum are reproduced hereinafter:

“The undersigned is directed to state that the Central Government employees who are governed by the Contributory Provident Fund Scheme (CPF Scheme) have been given repeated options in the past to come over to the Pension Scheme. The last such option was given in the Department of Personnel and Training O.M. No. F3(1)- Pension unit/85 dated the 6th June, 1985. However, some Central Government employees still continue under the CPF Scheme. The Fourth Central Pay Commission has now recommended that all CPF beneficiaries in service on January 1, 1986, should be deemed to have come over to the Pension Scheme on that date unless they specifically opt out to continue under the CPF Scheme.

2. After careful consideration the President is pleased to decide that the said recommendation shall be accepted and implemented in the manner hereinafter indicated.

3. All CPF beneficiaries, who were in service on 1.1.1986 and who are still in service on the date of issue of these orders will be deemed to have come over to the Pension Scheme.

3.2. The employees of the category mentioned above will, however, have an option to continue under the CPF Scheme, if they so desire. The option will have to be exercised and conveyed to the concerned Head of Office by 30.09.1987 in the form enclosed if the employees wish to continue under the CPF Scheme. If no option is received by the Head of Office by the above date the employees will be deemed to have come over to the Pension Scheme.

3.3. The CPF beneficiaries, who were in service on 1.1.1986, but have since retired and in whose case retirement benefits have also been paid under the CPF Scheme, will have an option to have their retirement benefits calculated under the Pension Scheme provided they refund to the Government, the Government contribution to the Contributory Provident Fund and the interest thereon, drawn by them at the time of settlement of the CPF Account. Such option shall be exercised latest by 30.09.1987.

3.4. In the case of CPF beneficiaries, who were in service on 1.1.1986 but have since retired, and in whose case the CPF Account has not already been paid, will be allowed retirement benefits as if they were borne on pensionable establishments unless they specifically opt by 30.09.1987 to have their retirement benefits settled under the CPF Scheme.

3.5 in the case of CPF beneficiaries, who were in service on 1.1.1986, but have since died. Either before retirement or after retirement, the case will be settled in accordance with para 3.3 or 3.4 above as the case may be. Options in such cases will be exercised latest by 30.09.1987 by the widow/widower and in the absence of widow/widower by the eldest surviving member of the family who would have otherwise been eligible to family pension under the Family Pension Scheme if such scheme were applicable.

3.6 The option once exercised shall be final.

3.7 In t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top