SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

22026 Supreme(Online)(All) 1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
Ram Chander Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P – Respondent


Reserved HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW Ram Chander Yadav …..Applicant(s)

Versus State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt., Lko. and another …..Opposite Party(s)

Counsel for Applicant(s) : Salil Kumar Srivastava, Rahul Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Indu Prakash Singh CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 367 of 2023 State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home, Lucknow …..Revisionist(s)

Versus Ram Chandar Yadav …..Opposite Party(s)

Counsel for Revisionist(s) : G.A., Counsel for Opposite Party(s) :

Court No. - 17 HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J.

1. Heard Sri Salil Kumar Srivastava, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Sri Kanishk Sinha, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri V.K. Shahi, learned Additional Advocate General and Dr. V.K. Singh, learned Govt. Advocate appearing for the State and Sri I.P. Singh, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Sri Vijay Kumar Verma, learned counsel for the complainant.

2. The present application has been filed with the following prayer :-

"WHEREFORE, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to pass an order thereby quashing the order dated order dated 16.12.2022 passed by Special Judge (MP/MLA)/Additional Dis

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top