SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(All) 1029

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
Hetram – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondent


HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD Hetram and others …..Appellant(s)

Versus State of U.P.

…..Respondent(s)

Counsel for Appellant(s) : Om Prakash Shukla, Ramanuj Tripathi, S.d.n.singh, Tej Pal Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.G.A.

Neutral Citation No. - 2026:AHC:105087 AFR Judgement Reserved on 09.02.2026 Judgement Delivered on 07.05.2026 Judgement Uploaded on 07.05.2026 Court No. - 71 HON'BLE AVNISH SAXENA, J.

1. Heard Sri Ashwini Tripathi, learned Advocate holding brief appeared for the appellants and Sri Chandra Badan, learned counsel for the State.

THE APPEAL :-

2. The present criminal appeal under Section 374 CrPC has been preferred by the three accused/appellants, namely, Hetram son of Shri Dhar, Shanker son of Shibba and Bhudat son of Chetram in Sessions Trial No. 259 of 1983 (State Vs. Hetram & others), on being aggrieved by judgment of conviction and sentenced dated 08.05.1984, wherein all the three accused/appellants were convicted for offence of rape and sentenced to seven years rigorous imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 500/-, in default thereof further six months rigorous imprisonment.

THE PROSECUTION CASE AND TRIAL :-

3. The prosecution case disclosed in the written information E

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top