Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
NARENDRA KUMAR VYAS
Utkarsh Ottalwar S/o Shri V.C. Ottalwar – Appellant
Versus
Ashok Kumar Tiwari S/o Late Shri Taturam Tiwari – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. second appeal's admission and substantial question. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. factual context of the land dispute. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 10) |
| 3. court's analysis on the validity of lease and sale. (Para 11 , 12 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 4. arguments regarding retrospective application of amendments. (Para 14 , 16 , 21 , 22) |
| 5. amendments must be interpreted with clarity about retrospective effect. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 6. final conclusion dismissing the appeal. (Para 29) |
JUDGMENT :
NARENDRA KUMAR VYAS, J.
1. This is plaintiffs’ second appeal under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code, 1908 against the judgment and decree dated 24.03.2011 passed by the learned 5th Additional District Judge, District Bilaspur (C.G.) in Civil Appeal No. 21A/2010 against the judgment and decree dated 30.07.2010 passed by the learned First Civil Judge, Class-II, Bilaspur (C.G.) in Civil Suit No. 130-A/2008 by which the suit filed by the plaintiffs for title and declaration has been dismissed.
2. The parties have been described as per their description before the trial Court in Civil Suit No. 130-A/2008.
3. The second appeal has been admitted by this Court on 01.07.2021 on the following substantial question of law
Amendments to land revenue legislation confer Bhumiswami rights retrospectively, necessitating compliance for valid land transfers; sales executed without required permissions are null and void.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the transfer of land without prior permission from the Collector under section 165(7-b) of the Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code is void ab ini....
The court affirmed that Bhumiswami rights cannot be transferred without proper permissions as mandated by the Land Revenue Code, and the petitioners failed to establish valid occupancy rights.
The judgment affirms that civil courts lack jurisdiction over certain land disputes involving aboriginal tribes under specific statutory provisions.
A Will executed by a tribal law owner does not require Collector's permission for validity under land transfer laws.
The delay of 11 years in exercising suo motu powers renders such actions arbitrary, violating established legal rights under registered sale deeds.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
