HIGH COURT OF DELHI
MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR, J
M/S IRB AHMEDABAD VADODARA SUPER EXPRESS TOLLWAY PVT. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
The challenge, and issue in controversy
1. Under challenge at the instance of IRB Ahmedabad Super Expressway, [“IRB” hereinafter], in the present petition preferred under Section 34 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, [“the 1996 Act” hereinafter] is an arbitral award passed by a learned three-member Arbitral Tribunal on 7 April 2024. IRB was the claimant in the arbitral proceedings, and the National Highways Authority of India, [NHAI] was the respondent and counter-claimant.
2. The challenge, in this petition, is restricted to the rejection, by the Arbitral Tribunal, of the claim of IRB for compensation, from NHAI, under Article 35.4 of the Concession Agreement, [“CA” hereinafter], dated 25 July 2011, executed between them.
3. To clear the air and not for anything else, I may note, here, that the CA envisaged payment of premium by IRB to NHAI. The Government had announced a Premium Deferment Scheme, whereunder part of the premium could be paid by Concessionaires (such as IRB) upfront, and the remainder deferred for payment later. NHAI raised a counter-claim, in the arbitral proceedings, against IRB, claiming payment of the deferred premium. The Arbitral Tribunal ha
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.