Back
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH
KALYAN RAI SURANA, SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND
Saken Ali S/O Babur Ali – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background and evidence regarding the petitioner's claim of indian citizenship. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. tribunal rejection of evidence due to material contradictions and lack of supporting proof. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 3. conflicting contentions of the petitioner and respondents regarding the admissibility of evidence. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. procedural failure to include key documents or facts in the original pleadings. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 5. burden of proof lies with the suspect to establish linkage through cogent, admissible evidence. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 6. jurisdictional validity of tribunal references despite procedural irregularities in initial inquiries. (Para 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38) |
| 7. limited scope of certiorari jurisdiction and final order affirming citizenship status. (Para 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46) |
JUDGMENT AND ORDER :
(K.R. Surana, J.)
Heard Mr. M.U. Mahmud, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. K. Phukan, learned CGC for respondent no.1; Mr. G. Sarma, learned standing counsel for FT, Border matters and NRC for respondent nos. 2, 4 and 5; and Mr. H.K.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
