THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH
KALYAN RAI SURANA, SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND, JJ.
Saken Ali S/O Babur Ali - Appellant
Versus
The Union Of India And Ors. - Respondent
WP(C) No.4946 of 2017
Decided On : 24-04-2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background and evidence regarding the petitioner's claim of indian citizenship. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. tribunal rejection of evidence due to material contradictions and lack of supporting proof. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 3. conflicting contentions of the petitioner and respondents regarding the admissibility of evidence. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. procedural failure to include key documents or facts in the original pleadings. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 5. burden of proof lies with the suspect to establish linkage through cogent, admissible evidence. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 6. jurisdictional validity of tribunal references despite procedural irregularities in initial inquiries. (Para 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38) |
| 7. limited scope of certiorari jurisdiction and final order affirming citizenship status. (Para 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46) |
JUDGMENT AND ORDER :
(K.R. Surana, J.)
Heard Mr. M.U. Mahmud, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. K. Phukan, learned CGC for respondent no.1; Mr. G. Sarma, learned standing counsel for FT, Border matters and NRC for respondent nos. 2, 4 and 5; and Mr. H.K. Hazarika, learned Govt. Advocate for respondent no.3.
2. By filing this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner, namely, Md. Saken Ali, has assailed the opinion dated 17.07.2017, passed by the learned Member, Foreigners Tribunal No. 1, Goalpara, Assam, in F.T. Case No. 751/G/2006 [arising out of Ref. Case No. GLP(B)/Doubtful IM/98/7196; ERO Case No. 158-98/38], thereby declaring him to be a foreigner, who had entered into Assam on or after 25.03.1971.
3. In his written statement that was filed on 10.09.2008, apart from usual statements denying that he was a foreigner, the petitioner had stated that he was born in village- Katlamari, under River Police Station, Pancharatna, Dist. Goalpara. The name of his father is Babur Ali, whose name is enlisted in the voter list of 1966 of village- South Katlamari, under 43 Bongaigaon LAC. The petitioner had also casted his vote previously at Khutamari Voting Centre. The name of Khanu Sk, petitioner’s grandfather appeared in the said voter list. The petitioner is presently staying in village- Khutamari, PS and Dist. Goalpara, Assam, as river Brahmaputra had eroded his residence of 19 years. It was also stated that the case was filed against the petitioner for harassment. Accordingly, it was prayed that the petitioner be declared not a foreigner but an Indian Citizen.
4. In support of his defence, the petitioner had examined himself as DW-1. Apart from reiterating the statements made in his written statement, the petitioner had stated that the name of his father- Babur Ali; grandfather- Thanu Sheikh, grandmother- Chambuli Nessa, paternal uncle- Azid Sheikh and paternal aunt- Sahar Bhanu, appeared in the same house in the voter list of 1970 of village- Dakshin Katlamari Part, under 43 Bongaigaon LAC. The name of his parents, Babur Ali and Shaharun Nessa are recorded in the voter list of 1979 of village- 193 Katlamari, under 38 Goalpara West LAC, and the names of his grandfather- Thanu Sheikh, @ Khanu Sheikh and paternal uncle- Amzadali appeared in the same house in the said voter list. It was also stated that Village-Katlamari was eroded in the River Brahmaputra and therefore, his father along with his family members including him shifted to village- Khutamari under Balijana Circle, P.S., Sub-Division and Dist. Goalpara. His name was first enumerated and appeared in the voter list of 1989 of village- Khutamari under 38 Goalpara LAC, and the names of his parents, Babor Ali and Saharun Nessa were also recorded under the same house of the said voter list. His name was also recorded in the voter list of 1997 village No.7 Khutamari, under 38 Goalpara West LAC, and the names of his parents, Babor Ali and Saharun Nessa and his wife Johura Khatun are also recorded under the same house of t
In citizenship proceedings, the statutory burden of proof rests entirely on the individual to provide consistent and corroborated documentary evidence. Oral testimony, when contradictory or unsupport....
The burden of proof for citizenship lies with the individual claiming it, and failure to provide credible evidence results in a declaration of foreigner status.
The court upheld the Tribunal's decision declaring the petitioner a foreigner due to insufficient evidence of citizenship, emphasizing the importance of credible documentation.
The burden of proof to establish citizenship under the governing act rests solely on the individual. Mere production of identity documents or inconsistent records without verifiable genealogical link....
The burden of proof lies on the petitioner to establish citizenship, which was not met due to insufficient evidence linking her to her claimed lineage.
The burden of proving citizenship lies exclusively with the proceedee. Failure to disclose material facts in pleadings or providing contradictory documentary and oral evidence results in an adverse p....
The burden of proof for citizenship lies with the individual asserting it, and failure to produce evidence can lead to a declaration of foreigner status.
The petitioner failed to prove citizenship under the Foreigners Act, 1946, as the presented documentation was insufficient and lacked proper verification.
Review petitions in citizenship cases require new evidence or errors apparent on record, not mere re-hearing of previous arguments.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.