THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) KOHIMA BENCH
YARENJUNGLA LONGKUMER
Mahabir Paswan – Appellant
Versus
State Of Nagaland, Represented Through The Home Commissioner To The Govt. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual overview of petitions and history of disciplinary orders. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 2. petitioners' contention that criminal acquittal necessitates overturning disciplinary findings based on identical facts. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 3. respondents' argument on the independence of disciplinary proceedings from criminal trial outcomes. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 4. court holds internal disciplinary proceedings are distinct and hold finality if procedurally correct. (Para 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 5. dismissal of writ petitions due to lack of merit. (Para 30) |
ORDER :
YARENJUNGLA LONGKUMER, J.
WP(C) No. 203 (K)/2025 and WP(C) No. 204 (K)/2025 are disposed of by this common Order as both the petitions are similar in nature and pertains to the same issues.
2. The petitioner in WP(C)/203/2025 was appointed as NCE cook under the Police Department by an Order dated 30.04.2011, and he is serving the department till date. Based on a complaint, a criminal case was registered against the petitioner being Kohima South PS Case No. 0021/2018 U/S 420 IPC R/W 7/13 (2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. In view of the registrati
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.