SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 328

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
J. C. DOSHI, J
MANJULABEN MAHENDRABHAI CHAUHAN – Appellant
Versus
SHAIKH RAHIM SHAIKH NAZIR – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:MR.HIREN M MODI(3732) ,Respondent Advocate: RULE SERVED(64)

Table of Content
1. accident details and claim (Para 2 , 5)
2. appellant's submissions on compensation (Para 3)
3. respondent's counterarguments (Para 4)
4. court's analysis of evidence (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
5. enhanced compensation awarded (Para 10 , 11 , 12)

JUDGMENT :

2. Brief facts of the case are as under :

Submissions of appellant :

3.1 Secondly, he would submit that learned Tribunal erred in taking up age of the claimants to adopt the multiplier. He would submit that as per settled principle of law, age of deceased is required to be taken up for applying multiplier, loss of future income and future prospects. Learned advocate Mr.Modi would submit that learned Tribunal erred in granting lesser amount towards loss of consortium which in present case should be granted to both parents individually being consortium under head of filial consortium. He would further submit that learned Tribunal erred in granting compensation under other heads on lower side.

Submissions of respondent :

4.1 Upon above submissions, he would submit to dismiss this appeal.

Analysis :

7. The deceased expired on 02.11.1998 out of the road accident. It is settled principle of law that the income of the deceased at the t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top