Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
G.S.SANDHAWALIA, RANJAN SHARMA
State of Himachal Pradesh – Appellant
Versus
Yog Raj – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. connected cases adjudicated by common judgment. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. petitioners claim relaxation under old rules. (Para 4) |
| 3. one-time relaxation for specified teacher posts. (Para 5) |
| 4. parity sought with saroj kumar appointees. (Para 6 , 16 , 17) |
| 5. no vested right to appointment post-consideration. (Para 12) |
| 6. relaxation discretionary, not perpetual or mandamus. (Para 13) |
| 7. slp dismissal without reasons not precedent. (Para 14) |
| 8. future vacancies filled per current rules. (Para 15 , 18) |
| 9. ncte mandates two-year diploma qualification. (Para 19) |
| 10. impugned judgment quashed; writs dismissed. (Para 20 , 22) |
JUDGMENT :
Ranjan Sharma, J.
Since factual matrix and issues involved in above cases is common, therefore, with consent of Learned Counsels for the parties herein, all these cases are taken up together for adjudication by a common judgment.
2. For convenience sake, LPA No 194 of 2023, In Re: State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors versus Yog Raj and others is treated as the “Lead Case” so as to adjudicate all connected cases altogether.
3. The State of Himachal Pradesh, being the appellant, has come up before this Court, in Intra Court Appeal, in the Lead Case herein, assailing
No vested right to appointment after consideration under one-time qualification relaxation; such measure not perpetual for future vacancies; ineligible candidates cannot claim parity or court-mandate....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
