IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
K VINOD CHANDRAN, T. R. Ravi, JJ
HIGH COURT OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR (GENERAL) – Appellant
Versus
RESHMA A., D/O.ASHOK P., AISWARYA HOUSE, 48/2164, DIG LANE, ELAMAKKARA P.O., ERNAKULAM - 682 025. – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Vinod Chandran, J.
Whether Rule 7 of the Kerala Judicial Service Rules, 1991 as amended in the year 2019, runs counter to the directions issued in Malik Mazhar Sultan (3) v. U.P. Public Service Commission [2008) 17 SCC 703]? If not, whether the party respondents/writ petitioners and other similarly placed candidates, who figure in the merit list approved by the Governor, could be appointed to the vacancies arising within one year of the date of approval, in excess of the vacancies notified? These are the two questions arising for our consideration in the appeal. The learned Single Judge directed that an additional list be forwarded to the Governor for approval and appointment as Munsiff-Magistrates, in accordance with the rules, from the merit list dated 20.02.2020. The High Court is in appeal from the directions issued by the learned Single Judge.
2. Sri.Elvin Peter, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the appellant, would invite us to the various Record of Proceedings of the Hon'ble Supreme Court and specifically refer to Malik Mazhar Sultan (3) and Malik Mazhar Sultan v. U.P. Public Service Commission [(2009) 17 SCC 24]. The Hon'ble Supreme Court while laying down a tim
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.