IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
RANJILAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the charges and preliminary findings for proceeding. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments regarding procedural adherence to bnss. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. discussion on ongoing proceedings and rights. (Para 6 , 8 , 10) |
| 4. conclusion on the dismissal of the crl.m.c. (Para 9 , 11) |
ORDER
The challenge in this Crl.M.C is against Annexure III order of the Special Court for Scheduled Caste/Scheduled Tribe (PoA) Act Cases, Kottarakkara, by which it was decided to proceed against the petitioner for the offences under Sections 3 23, 294(b), 506(i) of IPC and (1)(s) and 3(1)(r) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 ['the SC/ST (PoA) Act' for short]. The order is passed on a complaint filed by the 2nd respondent raising the following allegations;
The complainant was working as a Sales officer in the company owned by the 1st accused/ petitioner. Alleging that the complainant had misappropriated the company's money, by not remitting the amounts received from the shops to which hardware items were supplied, on 04.01.2024 at 9 am the 1st accused snatched the complainant's mobile phone, bike key and Aadhar card when he reached the office. T
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.