Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
A.BADHARUDEEN
T.G.Venugopal S/O.Gopala Pillai – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala Represented By Public Prosecutor – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appellant challenges conviction and sentence. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. prosecution's allegations against the accused. (Para 4 , 6) |
| 3. arguments on admissibility of evidence. (Para 7 , 8 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. court analysis of legal standards for documents. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 5. evidence presented regarding misappropriation of goods. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 6. court's conclusion on evidence and conviction. (Para 35 , 36 , 37) |
| 7. modification of sentence and order. (Para 39 , 40) |
JUDGMENT :
A. BADHARUDEEN, J.
1. The 1st accused in C.C. No.36/2008 on the the Court of the Enquiry Commissioner and Special Judge, Kottayam, has filed this appeal, under Section 374 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [hereinafter referred as ‘Cr.P.C.’ for short], challenging the conviction and sentence imposed by the Special Judge, against him as per the judgment dated 07.05.2011. The State of Kerala, represented by the Special Public Prosecutor is arrayed as the respondent herein.
2. Heard the learned senior counsel for the appellant and the learned Special Public Prosecutor, in detail. Carefully gone through the verdict under challenge, the evidence available and also the decisions placed by b
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
