Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
A. BADHARUDEEN, J
T.G.VENUGOPAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appellant challenges conviction and sentence. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. prosecution's allegations against the accused. (Para 4 , 6) |
| 3. arguments on admissibility of evidence. (Para 7 , 8 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. court analysis of legal standards for documents. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 5. evidence presented regarding misappropriation of goods. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 6. court's conclusion on evidence and conviction. (Para 35 , 36 , 37) |
| 7. modification of sentence and order. (Para 39 , 40) |
JUDGMENT
2. Heard the learned senior counsel for the appellant and the learned Special Public Prosecutor, in detail. Carefully gone through the verdict under challenge, the evidence available and also the decisions placed by both sides.
4. The prosecution alleges commission of offences punishable under Sections 13 (1)(d) read with 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 [hereinafter referred as ‘P.C. Act, 1988 for short] and under Section 477A and 120B of the Indian Penal Code [hereinafter referred as ‘ IPC ’ for short], by the 1st and 2nd accused. The speci the prosecution is that, accused Nos.1 and 2, while working in the Kerala State Civil Supplies Corporation, Maveli Store, Edathua, hatched c
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
