Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V., K.V.JAYAKUMAR
Sreekumar M.R. S/o Ramakrishna Pillai – Appellant
Versus
Travancore Devaswom Board – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. establishes factual background and parties involved in the case. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments presented by the petitioners and the respondents regarding the claim for rent. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. discussion on the legal questions regarding tenant liability and property ownership. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 4. explanation of laws concerning tenancy and notification impacts. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 5. conclusion that writ petition is dismissed, indicating no entitlement to relief. (Para 27) |
JUDGMENT :
K.V. JAYAKUMAR, J.
1. This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following reliefs:
i. Issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order, or direction, quashing the impugned demand notices Exhibit.P4, P4(a), P4(b), P4(c) & P4(d) and the consequent RR notices Exhibit.P7, P7(a), P7(b), P7(c) & P7(d);
ii. Declare that the petitioners are not liable to pay any rent arrears from the period from June 2020 to November 2023 to the TDB, in view of the acquisition of the premises and vesting the same pursuant to S.3D notification with NHAI and cessation of ownership of TDB;
iii. Issue a writ of mandamus or appropria
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
