SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATHIBA M.SINGH
Naresh Jain – Appellant
Versus
Dharamveer Singh – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)--This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

2. The present second appeal has been filed challenging the impugned judgment dated 17th March, 2020, passed by the by the ld. ADJ-1, North East District, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi (hereinafter, "First Appellate Court") in RCA DJ No. 31/2019. Vide the said order, the appeal against the decree dated 23rd January, 2019 passed by the ld. ASCJ, North East, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi (hereinafter, "Trial Court"), in Suit No. 340/2018, has been dismissed.

3. The Trial Court on 23rd January, 2019 decreed the suit in favour of the Plaintiff/landlord/Respondent (hereinafter, "landlord") under Order XII Rule 6 CPC, and had directed possession to be handed over to the landlord. The operative portion of the order of the Trial Court reads as under:

    "Arguments considered.

    As per para 3 of reply of the defendant, he is willing to pay the rent but the plaintiff is not receiving the rent. In reply to legal notice dated 14.06.2018 it is admitted that the defendant paid rent @ Rs.700/- to be plaintiff in good faith. In his reply to legal notice dated 30.11.2009 the defendant has also admitted his tenancy.

    The pla

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top