Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
T.R.RAVI
Reshmi N., W/o. Aswin M.R. – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala, Rep. By Secretary To General Education Department – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. status of parties and prior appointments (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. petitioner's further submissions and revisions (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. affidavits regarding appointment conflicts (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. counter-arguments by respondents regarding petitions (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 5. examination of inconsistencies surrounding ext.p18 (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 6. court's directions and orders to reconsider (Para 22 , 23) |
JUDGMENT :
T.R. RAVI, J.
These two writ petitions relate to the same issue and are heard and disposed of together. The status of the parties and the exhibits referred to is as stated and produced in W.P.(C)No. 12105 of 2021.
2. One M.Ramachandran, who was working as a teacher in MAM UP School, retired on 30.4.2015. On 1.6.2015, Smt.Jyothi was appointed as UPSA by the Manager. On the same day the 6th respondent is stated to have been appointed as LPSA in an additional vacancy which had been sanctioned, as per Ext.R6(a). Smt.Jyothi resigned from the school on 10.7.2015. The petitioner was appointed as a UPSA at the MAM UP School, in the retirement vacancy of Sri. Ramachandran, with effect from 29.07.2015, as seen from Ext.P1 proposal. The AEO, Kunnaman
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
