SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Mad) 404

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.B.BALAJI
K.A.Shanmugham – Appellant
Versus
M.K.Basheer – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr.K.Govi Ganesan
For the Respondent: Mr.K.Sudhakar

JUDGMENT :

P.B. BALAJI, J.

The plaintiff in a suit for specific performance, is the appellant in the above appeal suit.

2.Pleadings:

The plaint in brief:

The plaintiff entered into a registered agreement of sale on 07.12.2015 to purchase the properties belonging to the defendant, for a total sale consideration of Rs.10,50,000/-. The agreement was registered in Doc.No.13846 of 2015. On the date of the agreement, the plaintiff paid Rs.10,00,000/- as advance. It was agreed that the balance Rs.50,000/- would be paid within 24 months from the date of agreement and the sale deed would be registered thereafter. The plaintiff has always been ready and willing to perform his part of the contract. On 07.11.2017, the plaintiff sent a lawyer's notice, expressing readiness and willingness and also calling upon the defendant to come to the SRO, Avinashi, to conclude the sale deed to execute and register the sale deed. Despite receipt of the said notice, the defendant turned a deaf ear. As the defendant is trying to defeat and defraud the lawful rights of the plaintiff and making hectic arrangements to alienate the suit properties to third parties, the plaintiff has come forward seeking specific perfo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top