Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N.SATHISH KUMAR, J
DAYALAN RAJES – Appellant
Versus
VIJAYAN RAJES – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appeals concerning common judgment in partition suits. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. factual background of family and property inheritance. (Para 6) |
| 3. defendants' arguments on family arrangement validity. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. plaintiffs' claims regarding family arrangement and partition. (Para 19 , 20) |
| 5. court's considerations on family arrangement evidence. (Para 25 , 26 , 30) |
| 6. considerations on the validity of the will. (Para 40 , 41) |
| 7. final judgments on appeals and family arrangement status. (Para 49) |
N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.
2.A.S.No.856 of 2025 has been preferred by the plaintiff in O.S.No.116 of 2004 which was also dismissed by the trial court by a judgment and decree dated 24.03.2025. To be noted, the plaintiff in both O.S.Nos.73 and 116 of 2004 is one and the same person.
4.Since the issues in all the three appeal suits are connected with each other and the suit properties in the above three suits are also connected to each other, this Court was inclined to hear the above three appeal suits together and these three appeals are being disposed of by this common judgment. In this common judgment, the parties herein shall be referred to as per their rankings in the trial court in a
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
