Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Mr. T.Vinod Kumar, J
V.N.Munuswamy(died) – Appellant
Versus
The State Bank of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. service confirmation and pension entitlement. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. petitioner's pension request and representation. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. respondents' counterarguments to pension eligibility. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 4. court's analysis on pension eligibility rules. (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 5. criteria for pensionable service and membership. (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 39) |
| 6. eligibility conditions and service records. (Para 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 40) |
| 7. delay in raising pension claims. (Para 41 , 42 , 43) |
| 8. legal precedents affecting pension claims. (Para 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48) |
| 9. delay and laches in court claims. (Para 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56) |
| 10. summary of conclusions on pension eligibility. (Para 57 , 58) |
| 11. writ petition dismissal. (Para 59 , 60) |
O R D E R
Heard the learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the respondents and perused the records.
2. The case of the petitioner, in brief, is that he had joined the service of the respondent bank on 29.06.1981 and after probation of 6 months period, his service was confirmed with effect from 29.12.1981; that while
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
