Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J
M.Srinivasa Rao – Appellant
Versus
The Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority – Respondent
No legal document content was provided in
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner challenges planning permission. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. respondents' counter affidavits and defenses. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 3. court analysis of jurisdiction and applicable regulations. (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42) |
| 4. writ petition dismissed with restrictions. (Para 43) |
ORDER
The petitioner challenges the planning permission issued by the 1st respondent to the 3rd respondent with respect of the property situated in T.S.No.4860, 7025, 7026 and 4861/1, 7036/1 and 2, 7027/1 and 2 in Block No.113 of T.Nagar Village.
2. The petitioner states that the 3rd respondent is running a hotel under the name and style of ‘Residency Towers’ at T.S.No.4861, 7025, 7026, 7028 on Thyagaraya Road. The 3rd respondent subsequently purchased the property at T.S.No.7036/1, 7036/2, 7027/1 and 7027/2 on Raman Street from the erstwhile owners. The petitioner states that, in terms of the Master Plan, Raman Street is a residential area and there are no commercial establishments in the said area. It states as per the Master Plan, Raman Street is c
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
