IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M. DHANDAPANI, J.
Dr.K.Pushpam - Petitioner
Versus
The Secretary, Department Of Law – Respondent
W.P.No.8867 of 2024, W.M.P.Nos.9870 and 9872 of 2024
Decided On : 16-02-2026
ORDER :
M. DHANDAPANI, J.
The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records from the second respondent (i.e. The Registrar, The Tamil Nadu Dr.Ambedkar Law University) relating to the list of selected candidates for the post of Assistant Professors in Sociology published vide proceedings relating to the list of selected candidates dated 19.12.2023 and quash the same in so far as is declares the third respondent who was initially rejected/ ineligible whereas selected for the post of Assistant Professor in Sociology in General Turn as illegal, arbitrary, discriminative, unconstitutional and without jurisdiction and consequently direct the second respondent to appoint the petitioner for the post of Assistant Professor in Sociology in the second respondent University with effect from 19.12.2023 with pay and salary benefits, service and all other attendant benefits which the petitioner would have been given/ paid and her name has to be included/ published in the selection list of candidates dated 19.12.2023 by the second respondent.
2.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner studied B.A.Rural Industries and Management with Gold Medal and M.A.Sociology with Gold Medal in Gandhigram Rural University, Dindigul. Subsequently the petitioner did Master of Philosophy in the same University. The petitioner is qualified with UGC NET – JRF with UGC Fellowship and have also done Ph.D. in Sociology in the said University and have completed Post Doctorate (D.Litt.) with ICSSR Fellowship in Gandhigram Rural University.
3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner further submitted that the petitioner applied for the post of Assistant Professor on contract basis and appeared before the statutory committee consisting of around 10 members (legal luminaries) including Vice Chancellor, Dean of SOEL, HODs, other Professors and subject experts and was selected and appointed as Assistant Professor on contract basis in the year 2019. The petitioner also worked as Residential Additional Deputy Warden in the law College Women’s Hostel, Chepauk from November, 2021 to November, 2023. Apart from that the petitioner was assigned the work of faculty incharge of concerned Department. The petitioner was also assisting the SOEL office for maintenance and calculating salary hours for the guest lecturers. Whileso, the second respondent issued a notification dated 18.03.2023 calling for eligible candidates for appointment of Assistant Professors in various departments of the second respondent University.
4.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner further submitted that the petitioner submitted her application for the post of Assistant Professor in Sociology (Inter Disciplinary) and the second respondent published the list of eligible candidates, wherein, the petitioner’s name was found in serial no.7 and the second respondent published the list of rejected applications, wherein, the third respondent’s name was found. However, the third respondent was selected to the post of Assistant Professor in Sociology.
5.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner further submitted that as per the UGC Notification dated 18.07.2018, the required qualification for the post of Assistant Professor is a Master’s Degree with 55% marks in a concerned/ relevant/allied subject from an Indian University or an equivalent Degree from an accredited foreign University. Besides fulfilling the above qualifications, the candidate must have cleared the National Eligibility Test (NET) conducted by the UGC or the CSIR, or a similar test accredited by the UGC, like SLET/SET or who are or have been awarded a Ph.D.Degree in accordance with the University Grants Commission (Minimum Standards and Procedure for Award of M.Phil./Ph.D Degree) Regulations, 2009 or 2016 and their amendments from time to time as the case may be exempted from NET/SLET/SET.
6.The learned counsel appearing for t
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the appointment of an Associate Professor must comply with the qualifications prescribed by the relevant statutes and regulations, and the app....
Educational qualifications are essential for ensuring the quality of education and should not be overridden by teaching experience alone.
The court established that a Ph.D. is not a mandatory qualification for the Assistant Professor position, affirming that candidates with a Master's degree and NET qualification are equally eligible.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for candidates to comply with the submission of required documents as per the notice, and the court's reluctance to intervene in....
Employment and Service matter - Appointment as an Associate Professor in the School of Social Sciences of the Mahatma Gandhi University - Selection committee – Qualiification - Absence of post doctor....
Candidate eligibility must be satisfied by the application cutoff date; subsequent qualifications cannot be considered in selection processes.
The court held that knowledge of Telugu, listed as 'preferable' in the advertisement, effectively became mandatory due to the conditional appointment, highlighting the importance of adherence to spec....
Central Administrative Tribunal and the High Court had gone wrong in holding that the first respondent was qualified merely because he had studied two subjects as part of his MBA degree programme, na....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.