Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N. SATHISH KUMAR, R. SAKTHIVEL, JJ
M.D.Lakshmipathi Naidu – Appellant
Versus
M.D.Jagapathy Naidu – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. establishes claim regarding ownership and relationship dynamics. (Para 4 , 5 , 11) |
| 2. addresses additional evidence and procedural concerns regarding the appeal. (Para 20 , 21) |
| 3. affirms joint ownership rights and debtor liability among siblings. (Para 24 , 25 , 28) |
| 4. outcome reflects requirements for equitable distribution despite contested claims. (Para 30 , 31) |
J U D G M E N T
(Judgment was delivered by N. SATHISH KUMAR, J.
Challenging the decree and judgment of the learned District Judge, District Court No.II, Kancheepuram, dated 05.10.2018, passed in O.S.No.73 of 2015, granting a preliminary decree in favour of the plaintiff in respect of half share in the suit schedule properties, the 1st defendant in the suit has filed the above Appeal.
2.For the sake of convenience, the parties shall be referred to as per their ranking before the trial Court.
3.The 1st defendant is the elder brother of the plaintiff. The defendants 2 to 4 are the wife and children of the 1st defendant.
4.Brief facts of the plaintiff’s case is as follows :
The suit ‘A’ Schedule property and ‘B’ Schedule property were purchased by the plaintiff’s father M.N.Doraisamy and mother Saraswathi on 09.06.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
