Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P. Dhanabal, J
S.Murali – Appellant
Versus
Thoppamma – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the appeal relates to partition claims stemming from a contested will. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. disputes concerning the ownership and transfer history of the property are identified. (Para 4 , 6) |
| 3. arguments presented challenge the validity and enforcement of the will and ownership rights. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. the court emphasizes the requirement for evidence in proving the will's authenticity. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 19) |
| 5. the final judgment affirms the dismissal of the appeal, upholding the first appellate court's decree. (Para 20 , 21) |
JUDGMENT
The Second Appeal has been preferred as against the decree and judgment passed by the Subordinate Judge, Hosur in A.S. No.12 of 2013 dated 29.10.2014. The respondents herein, being the Plaintiffs, have filed the Suit in O.S. No.190 of 2004 on the file of the District Munsif, Hosur for the relief of partition and the said Suit was dismissed. Aggrieved by the said decree and judgment, the Plaintiffs have preferred an appeal before the Subordinate Judge, Hosur in A.S. No.12 of 2013 and the First Appellate Court reversed the judgment of the trial Court and allowed the appeal and decreed the Suit. Aggrieved by the said decree and
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
