Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Anita Sumanth, Mummineneni Sudheer Kumar, JJ
M.Ponniah – Appellant
Versus
The Chief Secretary to Government – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. non-provision of reservation for pwd violates constitutional mandate. (Para 1 , 3 , 11) |
| 2. arguments regarding non-selection of the petitioner based on procedural grounds. (Para 4 , 5 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. importance of timely identification of posts for reservation under the pwd act. (Para 20 , 21 , 30 , 31) |
| 4. court's directive for implementation of reservation in future selections. (Para 49 , 51 , 56) |
| 5. court's decision on compensation due to contempt of its prior orders. (Para 52 , 53 , 55) |
ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by Dr.Anita Sumanth J.)
The petitioner is affected by Polio from the hip downwards, and suffers from locomotive disability. He had been a petitioner in W.P.(MD)No.1691 of 2011, where the challenge had been to G.O.Ms.No.16 Public (Special.A) Department dated 05.01.2011 on the ground that no reservation had been provided for the category of Persons with Disability (PwD). The petitioner had therein, sought a consequential direction for his appointment as District Judge (Entry level).
2. That Writ Petition had been taken up along with other Writ Petitions culminating in decision dated 11.03.2011, wherein the Division Bench, after hearing the rival contentions
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
