Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.B.Balaji, J
M/s PREMA ENGINEERING – Appellant
Versus
V.VENGIDAPATHY – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. ownership and entitlement in family partition. (Para 1 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. petitioner's contention on fraud and improper decree. (Para 5 , 7 , 10 , 12 , 13) |
| 3. court's observations on the invalid settlement terms. (Para 14 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 4. fraudulent compromise and its implications on judgments. (Para 21 , 26 , 30) |
| 5. final ruling to strike off suits for improper judgment. (Para 32 , 33) |
COMMON ORDER
These revision petitions have been filed to set aside the judgment and decree in O.S. Nos.101 & 102 of 2022 dated 11.12.2024 on the file of the IV Additional District Court, Udumalpet.
2. I have heard Mr.Avinash Wadhwani, learned counsel for Mr.M.Mahamani, learned counsel for the revision petitioner in both these revision petitions, Mr.K.Selvaraj, learned counsel for R1, Mr.PA.Sai Govindaraja for Mr.G.Murugan, learned counsel for R2 to R5, Mr.Naveen Kumar Murthi for Mr.G.V.Mohan Kumar, learned counsel for R6, Mr.A.Anandan, learned Government Advocate for R15 to R17.
3. Brief facts that are necessary to decide the present revision petitions are as follows:-
An extent of 116 acres originally belonged to one Muthusamy Naicker. The said Muthusamy Naicker was blessed with two sons and t
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
