Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M.DHANDAPANI
J. Santhanalakshmi – Appellant
Versus
Tamil Nadu Housing Board, Represented by its Chairman – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's claim to undivided land share via prior agreements. (Para 4) |
| 2. respondents cite supreme court order limits to 54 flats. (Para 5) |
| 3. supreme court decision excludes petitioner from protected buyers. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
ORDER :
M.DHANDAPANI, J.
The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 and 2 to issue No Objection Certificate to the third respondent to execute the sale deed for the 516 sq.ft. of undivided share in the subject land comprised in O.S.Nos.39/1, 2, 3 Part, 295/1 and 2, 296 Part and 297/1 Part T.S.No.14/2 Part, Block No.129, measuring an extent of 39264 sq.ft. (90 cents), Kodambakkam Village, Mambalam-Guindy Taluk, Chennai, in the name of the petitioner pursuant in the agreement of sale dated 23.01.2007 entered into between the husband of the petitioner and the third respondent.
2.The learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the land measuring 90 cents in Survey No.297/1, Kodambakkam Village, Mambalam-Guindy Taluk, Chennai [hereinafter referred to as ‘subject property’] belong to the Tamil Nadu Housing Board and without knowledge that the subject property bel
Supreme Court order binding on flat buyers; excluded buyers cannot seek writ relief for title conveyance.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
