Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
K.MURALI SHANKAR, J
Arunachala Velar – Appellant
Versus
Sri Udhuman Syed Mohammed – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts and history of title to the suit property (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 30) |
| 2. defendants’ contentions regarding title and limitation (Para 5 , 7 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 31 , 35 , 36) |
| 3. procedural history and evidence adduced (Para 6 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 23 , 37) |
| 4. section 100 cpc limitations and supreme court rulings (Para 12 , 13 , 38) |
| 5. authentication and identity of property documents (Para 21 , 22 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 6. validity of partition under mohammedan law (Para 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 7. final findings and dismissal of second appeals (Para 39 , 40 , 41 , 42) |
COMMON JUDGMENT
1.These two Second Appeals are directed against the judgment and decree made in A.S.No.147 of 2012 dated 23.01.2018 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Court, Tirunelveli, reversing the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.1264 of 1987 dated 29.06.2012 on the file of the I Additional District Munsif Court, Tirunelveli.
2. The appellants in S.A.(MD)No.310 of 2018 are the defendants 1 and 2 and the appellant in S.A.(MD)No.167 of 2020 is the fourth defendant. The deceased first respondent in both the appeals as plaintiff filed the suit in O.S.No.1264 of 1987 before the District Munsif
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
