SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 286

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Gurusharan Singh – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Vibhor Kumar Sahu,Advocate General

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH

AT GWALIOR

BEFORE

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND RAMESH PHADKE

MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 27099 of 2023

GURUSHARAN SINGH

Versus

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS

Appearance:

Shri Sanjay Kumar Sharma - Advocate for the petitioner.

Shri APS Tomar - Public Prosecutor for the State.

Shri Rajiv Sharma - Advocate (through VC) along with Shri Quazi

Suhail - Advocate for the respondent No.2.

RESERVED ON :- 16/12/2025 DELIVERED ON :- 5/01/2026

ORDER p.m., Harshita Kushwaha made a telephonic call to the mobile phone of the husband of the prosecutrix, and both were allegedly engaged in conversation. When the prosecutrix inquired about the call, her husband informed her that he was speaking with Harshita, which led to a heated exchange between the spouses. On the following morning, at about 10:00 a.m., the prosecutrix went to the house of her sister situated at D.D. Nagar. From there, she allegedly used the mobile phone of Harshita’s father to contact him and informed him about the aforesaid situation. It was further alleged that Harshita’s father, Gurusharan Singh (the accused), informed the prosecutrix that the matter could not be discussed over the phone and asked her

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top