SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 261

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
PARVEEN KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH

132 CRM-7905-2019 in/&

Date of decision: 12.01.2026

Date of uploading: 12.01.2026

Parveen Kumar

....Applicant/Petitioner

V/s

State of Haryana and others

....Respondents

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL

Present: Mr. Ashwani Bhardwaj, Advocate for the applicant/petitioner.

*****

SUMEET GOEL, J. (Oral)

CRM-7905-2019

1. The present application has been filed on behalf of the applicant- petitioner seeking condonation of delay of 775 days in filing the accompanying revision petition. The main revision petition has been filed impugning the judgment dated 13.07.2016, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fatehabad dismissing the appeal preferred by the present applicant-petitioner, acquitting the respondent Nos.2 & 3 from the charges in FIR No.220 dated 12.08.2011 under Sections 292(2), 384 read with Section 120B IPC, at Police Station City Tohana, Distict Fatehabad. The applicant- petitioner, by way of instant revision petition, impugns the abovesaid

judgment.

2. Notice was issued in the application for condonation of delay. Office note indicates that dasti notices issued to private respondents have not been received back served or oth

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top