SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(P&H) 1268

SUMEET GOEL
U. T. Chandigarh – Appellant
Versus
Pankaj – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

Sumeet Goel, J.

CRM-4370-2019

1. The present application has been filed on the behalf of the applicant-State seeking condonation of delay of 173 days in filing the accompanying revision petition. The main revision petition has been filed impugned the judgement of acquittal dated 21.03.2018 passed by the learned Principle Magistrate, Juvenile Justice Board, Chandigarh, whereby the respondent (herein) (juvenile at the time of the alleged incident) was acquitted of the charges (notice of accusation) framed against him.

2. Learned counsel appearing for the applicant-State, while seeking grant of prayer for condonation of delay of 173 days, has argued that the delay has occurred as by the time the certified copy of the impugned judgement dated 21.03.2018, alongwith other relevant case documents was received at the office of the undersigned Public Prosecutor, the statutory period for filling the instant revision petition on behalf of the State had already expired. According to the learned counsel, after the assignment of the instant case, despite multiple reminders issued by the office of the undersigned, the necessary documents, including witness statements and evidence, were eve

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top