SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 355

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
THE HIND SAMACHAR LIMITED AND ANR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH The Hind Samachar Limited & another … Petitioners Versus State of Punjab & others … Respondents Reserved on : 19th January, 2026 Pronounced on : 23rd January, 2026 Uploaded on : 23rd January, 2026 Whether only operative part of the judgment is pronounced or the full judgment is pronounced: full judgment.

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SHEEL NAGU, CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV BERRY Present: Mr. Chetan Mittal, Senior Advocate (Arguing Counsel)

Mr. Akshay Bhan, Senior Advocate (Arguing Counsel)

Mr. Gaurav Chopra, Senior Advocate (Arguing Counsel)

with Mr. Prateek Gupta, Ms. Shifali Goyal, Mr. Himanshu Bindal, Mr. Pranshu Goyal and Mr. Avichal Sharma, Advocates for the petitioners. Mr. Maninderjit Singh Bedi, Advocate General Punjab (Arguing Counsel) with Ms. Kavita Joshi and Mr. Sangam Garg, Advocates for the State of Punjab and PSPCL.

Mr. D.S. Patwalia, Senior Advocate (Arguing Counsel)

with Mr. A.S.Chadha, Advocate for respondent-Punjab Pollution Control Board.

SHEEL NAGU, CHIEF JUSTICE

1. This petition invoking writ as well as supervisory jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 read with Article 227 of the Constitution of I

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top