IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ..Appellants Vs.

AZAD SINGH ..Respondent Reserved on: 06.11.2025 Date of decision: 22.01.2026 Uploaded on: 23.01.2026 Whether only the operative part of the judgment is pronounced? NO Whether full judgment is pronounced? YES CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present: Mr. Harish Nain, AAG, Haryana.

Mr. Karamveer Singh Banyana, Advocate for respondent.

SUDEEPTI SHARMA, J.

1. The challenge in the present appeal is to the judgment and decree dated 07.06.2006 passed by learned District Judge Karnal, whereby appeal filed by the Appellant-State was partially accepted and judgment and decree dated 19.01.2006 passed by learned Civil Judge, Junior Division, Karnal, whereby, civil suit filed by respondent was decreed in his favour is modified.

Brief facts:-

2. Brief facts of the case as per the pleadings in the civil suit are that the appellant was conveyed adverse remarks entered in ACR for the period from 16.05.1992 to 31.03.1993 and 01.04.1993 to 28.08.1993 by Deputy Inspector General,/ST/Rohtak Range, Rohtak vide memo No.438/ST/07.4.95 and 429/ST/07.4.95, respectively. His honesty was assessed doubtful