Back
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
FARJAND ALI
Lalit Pawan Sharma, S/o Shri Bashidar Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan Through Secretary, Medical, Health And Family Welfare Services, Government Of Rajasthan – Respondent
ORDER :
FARJAND ALI, J.
1. Learned counsels for the petitioners, at the outset, submit that the controversy raised in the instant writ petitions, is no more res-integra in view of the adjudication by a Division Bench of this Court in the case of State of Rajasthan & Ors. Vs. Suresh Kumar & Ors. : D.B. Special Appeal Writ No.414/2019 decided on 15.09.2025, observing thus:
1. These appeals are directed against the order dated19.12.2018 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court, whereby a direction was issued to the appellant-State to fill-up2500 posts in the same manner as has been held by the judgment dated 07.12.2016 passed in the case of Rajkumar & Ors. vs. Stateof Rajasthan & Ors. (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6207/2009).
2. Since, the facts have been aptly recorded in detail by the learned Single Judge, we need not dilate upon the facts of the case.
3. The facts, which are relevant for the present purposes are, however, noted for ready reference.
4. The appellant no. 5 – Additional Director (Admn.) issued an advertisement dated 04.05.2007 and invited applications from desirous candidates for engagement as Nurse Grade-II (GNM) for2500 posts in various districts of State. The sai
The court reinforced that state recruitment must comply with prior judicial decisions, ensuring all advertised posts are filled as mandated, thereby emphasizing adherence to principles of equality an....
Recruitment clauses mandating 100% reservation based on local residency in Scheduled Districts violate constitutional provisions, necessitating revision of merit list to ensure equitable opportunity ....
Merely being included in a select list does not provide an indefeasible right to appointment; the State can regulate vacancies as per policy needs, provided there is no arbitrariness.
Appointments for Grade III Teachers must reflect accurate merit while adhering to court directives on recruitment processes, ensuring transparency and fairness in selections.
The enhancement of posts in a recruitment process without reopening applications violates the right to equal opportunity under Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
