SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Raj) 616

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
ARUN MONGA, YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT
Rajasthan Technical University – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India, Through The Revenue Secretary, Ministry Of Finance – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Sharad Kothari, Mr. Kalpit Shishodia, Mr. Dinesh Kumar Bishnoi, Mr. Chirag Soni, Mr. Abhimanyu Yadhuvanshi, Mr. Bhuwaneshwar Singh Sisodia, Mr. C.S. Kotwani with, Mr. Avdesh Parashar, Mr. Ankur Mathur, Mr. Divik Mathur, Mr. Rahul Lakhwani, Ms. Adwaita Sharma, Mr. Chayan Bothra, Mr. Vinay Kothari with Mr. Bhavyadeep Singh
For the Respondent: Mr. Mahaveer Bishnoi, AAG with Mr. Harshwardhan Singh, Mr. Mrigraj Singh Rathore, Mr. Rajvendra Saraswat with Mr. Jitesh Kumar Suthar, Mr. Rajeev Purohit, Ms. Akshiti Singhvi

ORDER :

Arun Monga, J.

1. Rajasthan Technical University, a State university set up by Government of Rajasthan, is before this court, aggrieved against the impugned Show Cause Notice dated 26.12.2023 and; consequential proceedings vide which the act of affiliation granted by it to the affiliate colleges has been included in the statutory term “service” and; thus tax has been imposed on the University under the provisions of CGST, 2017 and directed to pay service tax with interest and penalty.

2. Case of the Petitioner University is that the impugned Show Cause Notice has been issued in contravention of the provisions of the Central Goods and Services Tax, 2017 (CGST Act). and Rules framed there under. It is also arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 265 and 300A of the Constitution of India. More of it later.

2.1. The controversy that warrants adjudication by court is whether or not the affiliation fee charged by a University, for grant of affiliation to its constituent college, is subject to levy of service Tax under CGST Act.

2.2 Bunch of petitions have been filed as per Appendix ‘A’ wherein similar controversy is involved and vide this common order and judgment all of tho

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top