Back
SUPREME COURT
, J
Shri Ram Karan Gupta – Appellant
Versus
M/s J.S. Exim Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts related to partition and auction process. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. highlights the execution of auction proceeds and adherence to cpc. (Para 5 , 8 , 10) |
| 3. court refutes claims of violation of auction process. (Para 6 , 12 , 14) |
| 4. affirms that an application for setting aside must be timely with requisite deposits. (Para 11 , 21) |
1. Leave granted.
2. This matter arises in execution and this appeal has been preferred by one of the judgment debtors challenging the common final judgment and order dated 11.11.2011 passed by the High Court of Delhi in C. M. (M) No. 1093 of 2011 and E.F.A. No. 15 of 2011.
3. Decree holders and judgment debtors are co - sharers of a property bearing No. 1-87, Ashok Vihar, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the 'suit property'). Late Rameshwar Dass Gupta filed a suit for partition of the suit property and after passing a preliminary decree, a final decree was passed and the suit property was ordered to be sold in public auction and sale proceeds were directed to be distributed among the shareholders.
4. Decree holders filed execution petition and vide order dated 20.11.2009, the auction sale was scheduled to be held on 9.1.2010. However, obje
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
