SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 1871

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
Pallavi AND OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
State Of Uttarakhand AND OTHERS – Respondent


HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Misc. Application No. 818 of 2017

25th July, 2025 Pallavi and Others -Applicants Versus State of Uttarakhand and Others -Respondents ---------------------------------------------------------------------

Presence:-

Dr. Kartikey Hari Gupta, learned counsel alongwith Mr. Rafat Munir Ali, learned counsel for the applicants.

Mr. B.N. Maulaki, learned Deputy Advocate General for the State. ---------------------------------------------------------------------

Hon'ble Alok Mahra, J.

This criminal miscellaneous application has been filed by the applicants challenging the charge-sheet dated 25.11.2016, summoning/cognizance order dated 10.01.2017 passed by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Udham Singh Nagar, in Criminal Case No. 192 of 2017 and the entire proceedings arising out from it.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties on merits and perused the records.

3. Brief facts of the case are that on 01.12.2014, the applicant no. 1 – Smt. Pallavi Jha was married to deceased Aditya Raj at Bhagalpur, Bihar. After the marriage, both husband and wife lived happily at Jamshedpur for some time; that on 21.04.2015, deceased Aditya Raj joined his services with

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top